Roughly two dozen US jurisdictions let a cottage-kitchen maker sell branded, shelf-stable food wholesale to retailers or restaurants for resale. The terms vary enormously — and the rules that disqualify makers are rarely the wholesale rules themselves.
The default position of American cottage food law is direct-to-consumer only. A minority of states permit "indirect" sales — to a store or restaurant that then resells. The wholesale channel is the exception, not the rule.
Among states that do open that channel, the strongest are Texas, New York, Georgia, Ohio, Wyoming, West Virginia, Tennessee, and Alaska. Each combines an open wholesale channel with low or zero cost of entry.
The single biggest recent change is Texas SB 541, effective 1 September 2025. Per Texas DSHS it opened wholesale of non-TCS foods to registered cottage food vendors, raised the annual gross-income threshold to $150,000, and requires no license.
The recurring deal-breakers are not the wholesale rules. They are maker-level disqualifiers — whole-residence pet bans, well-water testing, and mandatory kitchen inspections. These silently eliminate a large share of candidate makers, which is why they deserve their own section of this guide.
Texas, New York, Georgia, Ohio, Wyoming, West Virginia, Tennessee, Alaska.
All combine an open wholesale channel with low or zero cost and minimal maker disqualifiers.
Pennsylvania, Iowa, Virginia, California, North Carolina, Maryland, Massachusetts, DC, Hawaii, Arizona, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, New Hampshire, Oregon, Maine.
Each imposes a license, a fee, an inspection, well-water testing, training, or a channel restriction. Budget 30–90 days per maker for plan review and inspection.
The pet-rule states — Pennsylvania and North Carolina (whole-residence bans), Iowa (kitchen and storage rooms), Oregon (label disclosure) — will disqualify a large share of candidates. Screen for pets before investing in onboarding.
Rhode Island, Florida, Washington, Michigan, Minnesota, Illinois, Colorado, Nevada, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Vermont, Connecticut, Delaware, New Jersey, Kansas, New Mexico, Kentucky, Indiana, Missouri, Mississippi, South Dakota, Alabama, Nebraska.
A maker in these states cannot wholesale from a cottage kitchen. They would need a licensed commercial or food-processor facility.
Some are closed for non-obvious reasons. North Dakota and Montana have food-freedom laws with interstate provisions, but both are direct-to-consumer only — North Dakota's statute requires food be "consumed within a private home," which rules out commercial resale. Colorado remains closed to wholesale even after the 2026 Tamale Act. Florida has a $250,000 cap but no indirect sales at all.
Only Maine and Arkansas plausibly permit interstate sale, and both are subject to overriding federal FDA jurisdiction the moment product crosses a state line.
Georgia's HB 398 FAQ claims interstate shipping is permitted, but this conflicts with FDA jurisdiction — do not rely on it.
Plan the network as a set of independent intrastate operations, state by state, unless a maker obtains federal facility registration.
Growth is gated by state, not by capacity. Adding a state means re-reading that state's rules, not scaling a facility. Three practical consequences: