Why It Works Our Foods Articles Resources Stock Our Products Become a Maker
Overview & state tiers

Cottage food wholesale laws

Roughly two dozen US jurisdictions let a cottage-kitchen maker sell branded, shelf-stable food wholesale to retailers or restaurants for resale. The terms vary enormously — and the rules that disqualify makers are rarely the wholesale rules themselves.

Last reviewed July 2026 · Not legal advice
Scope This guide covers non-TCS foods — shelf-stable products that do not require time or temperature control for safety. That classification is what makes wholesale possible in most of these states. Products containing dairy, meat, high-moisture fillings, or anything requiring refrigeration fall under different and generally stricter rules, and most of the states listed here as open are closed to them.

The short version

The default position of American cottage food law is direct-to-consumer only. A minority of states permit "indirect" sales — to a store or restaurant that then resells. The wholesale channel is the exception, not the rule.

Among states that do open that channel, the strongest are Texas, New York, Georgia, Ohio, Wyoming, West Virginia, Tennessee, and Alaska. Each combines an open wholesale channel with low or zero cost of entry.

The single biggest recent change is Texas SB 541, effective 1 September 2025. Per Texas DSHS it opened wholesale of non-TCS foods to registered cottage food vendors, raised the annual gross-income threshold to $150,000, and requires no license.

The recurring deal-breakers are not the wholesale rules. They are maker-level disqualifiers — whole-residence pet bans, well-water testing, and mandatory kitchen inspections. These silently eliminate a large share of candidate makers, which is why they deserve their own section of this guide.

Three tiers

Tier 1 — best; launch here first

Texas, New York, Georgia, Ohio, Wyoming, West Virginia, Tennessee, Alaska.

All combine an open wholesale channel with low or zero cost and minimal maker disqualifiers.

  • Texas is the single strongest state: no license, $150,000 cap, both restaurants and retail, and an ID-privacy option in place of the residential address.
  • New York is excellent for a scaled single-product line — no published cap, free registration, wholesale to restaurants and grocery. Note it prohibits chocolate coating.
  • Ohio and Wyoming are turnkey, but Ohio bans reduced-oxygen packaging and Wyoming imposes a separate-shelf merchandising rule.
  • Tennessee excludes restaurants and bars — fine if the target accounts are grocery, gift, or coffee retail.

Tier 2 — workable, with friction

Pennsylvania, Iowa, Virginia, California, North Carolina, Maryland, Massachusetts, DC, Hawaii, Arizona, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, New Hampshire, Oregon, Maine.

Each imposes a license, a fee, an inspection, well-water testing, training, or a channel restriction. Budget 30–90 days per maker for plan review and inspection.

The pet-rule states — Pennsylvania and North Carolina (whole-residence bans), Iowa (kitchen and storage rooms), Oregon (label disclosure) — will disqualify a large share of candidates. Screen for pets before investing in onboarding.

Tier 3 — effectively closed

Rhode Island, Florida, Washington, Michigan, Minnesota, Illinois, Colorado, Nevada, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Vermont, Connecticut, Delaware, New Jersey, Kansas, New Mexico, Kentucky, Indiana, Missouri, Mississippi, South Dakota, Alabama, Nebraska.

A maker in these states cannot wholesale from a cottage kitchen. They would need a licensed commercial or food-processor facility.

Some are closed for non-obvious reasons. North Dakota and Montana have food-freedom laws with interstate provisions, but both are direct-to-consumer only — North Dakota's statute requires food be "consumed within a private home," which rules out commercial resale. Colorado remains closed to wholesale even after the 2026 Tamale Act. Florida has a $250,000 cap but no indirect sales at all.

Assume intrastate

Only Maine and Arkansas plausibly permit interstate sale, and both are subject to overriding federal FDA jurisdiction the moment product crosses a state line.

Georgia's HB 398 FAQ claims interstate shipping is permitted, but this conflicts with FDA jurisdiction — do not rely on it.

Plan the network as a set of independent intrastate operations, state by state, unless a maker obtains federal facility registration.

What this means for a maker network

Growth is gated by state, not by capacity. Adding a state means re-reading that state's rules, not scaling a facility. Three practical consequences:

  1. Launch in the no-cost Tier 1 states where a maker can begin selling within days rather than months.
  2. Screen for disqualifiers before onboarding — pets first, then well water, then whether the maker will accept a kitchen inspection.
  3. Re-verify annually. Texas, Georgia, Hawaii, DC, Alaska, and Oklahoma all changed within roughly 24 months. This area is moving faster than at any time in fifteen years.
Not legal advice This is a research summary, not legal guidance, and cottage food statutes change frequently. Verify current requirements with the relevant state agency before onboarding a maker or signing a retail account. Several figures in this guide are flagged as unresolved — see Sources & method.